Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 5741 - 5760 of 16,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” …In the decision, the Board applies long-established principles to find that two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if (1) they are both employers within the meaning of the common law;  and (2) they share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” …In the decision, the Board applies long-established principles to find that two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if (1) they are both employers within the meaning of the common law;  and (2) they share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:45 am
§ 1125(d) sets out a non-exhaustive list of 9 factors that a court may consider in determining, see here section D(1)(B)(i). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
In its decision last month, the panel first found that the deed of conveyance signed by the wife was only voidable, not void from the beginning, since the husband alleged that the wife’s signature and authority to convey were acquired by fraudulent means, but did not allege that the wife’s signature was forged. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:56 am by Jim Sedor
After Gary Tenaglia acknowledged the meaning of the writing on the napkin, James Warner retrieved the napkin and ate it. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:29 am by Arina Shulga
  Does it mean that hedge funds that are private funds relying on the 3(c)(1) exemption are still limited to 100 investors? [read post]
The judge also concluded that reasonable consumers understand that the “diet” label simply means low calorie. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The opponents (Os), in particular 04 in its letter of 29.12.2017,argued against a separate appealable decision on legal entitlement to priority since this would delay even further a decision on the merits of the case and by consequence decisions in the co-pending patents and would extend the legal uncertainty for the public. [read post]