Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 5761 - 5780 of 9,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
§ 4B1.2, which automatically increase the sentencing range to close to the statutory maximum by increasing the Criminal History Category to VI and adding levels to the total offense level. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
We all tend to take these practices for granted, but you can’t. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm by Venkat
Inducement liability: The court says that summary judgment was appropriately granted on the issue of inducement liability. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am by Jack Chin
It is often true that much legal scholarship is more theoretical than a judge can use on a practical level to answer a hard question in particular case. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Abigail Slater
  The Commission also ordered Comcast to carry the Tennis Channel “at the same level of distribution as Golf Channel and Versus. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Florian Mueller
Oracle's brief portrays her position as follows: "The professor 'firmly believes' that Congress was wrong to grant copyright protection to computer programs and should have created 'a new form of intellectual property law.'" [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:54 am by Simon Chester
Returning to this morning's decision, in Canadian National Railway Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
Given the increased level of protest and tension, there was a heightened level of military involvement.[16] In 1993, four conservative Ogani leaders were brutally massacred by a mob under disputed circumstances.[17] Eight community leaders were arrested for the incitement of violence, including MOSOP founder Ken Saro-Wiwa, and subsequently tortured, tried, then executed.[18] Instead of quelling discontent, this only incited more protest, with a continued military clampdown… [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 9:00 am by Lorraine Fleck
A recent decision Federal Court decision involving the manufacturer of Tupperware, Dart Industries Inc. v. [read post]