Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,027
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:18 pm
Co. of Connecticut v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded after rejecting both of the District Court's grounds. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
Special Electric brokered South African crocidolite (blue asbestos) in the United States, including some sales (about 7,000 tons) to JM’s Long Beach, California, facility, which manufactured Transite. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
The Company operated 316 Abercrombie & Fitch stores, 179 abercrombie kids stores, 501 Hollister Co. stores and 18 Gilly Hicks stores in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Mead Johnson & Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
Both plaintiff and defendants were Chinese corporations that made no sales in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:55 pm
On 23 December 2003, both parties' applications for temporary custody were denied and an injunction was issued prohibiting either party from taking the children out of the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
United States 12-1092Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when, in direc [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
Perrigo Company and Perrigo Israel (collectively, "Perrigo") are pharmaceutical companies that develop, manufacture, market and distribute generic pharmaceutical products for sale throughout the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:12 pm
Co., 747 F.Supp. 2d 1063 (W.D. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
But there may be few more fascinating, and regularly shifting, areas of judicial juggling than that of the application of the doctrine of fair use under United States copyright law. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:15 am
In American Family Life Assurance Co. of Columbus v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am
Federal Circuit Decides Egyptian GoddessOn Monday, September 22, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided the much anticipated design patent case – Egyptian Goddess v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
In its response to Apple's effort to win a permanent injunction in the United States against many Samsung products over multiple intellectual property rights, Samsung argues that the sales ban sought by Apple -- and denied by Judge Koh in December despite a multiplicity of infringement findings by a California jury in August 2012 -- "would not stop any ongoing infringement, for Samsung has either discontinued the accused products or designed around any infringing… [read post]