Search for: "Direct Sales Co. v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 1,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded after rejecting both of the District Court's grounds. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am by Schachtman
Special Electric brokered South African crocidolite (blue asbestos) in the United States, including some sales (about 7,000 tons) to JM’s Long Beach, California, facility, which manufactured Transite. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Company operated 316 Abercrombie & Fitch stores, 179 abercrombie kids stores, 501 Hollister Co. stores and 18 Gilly Hicks stores in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:55 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 23 December 2003, both parties' applications for temporary custody were denied and an injunction was issued prohibiting either party from taking the children out of the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
United States 12-1092Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when, in direc [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
  Perrigo Company and Perrigo Israel (collectively, "Perrigo") are pharmaceutical companies that develop, manufacture, market and distribute generic pharmaceutical products for sale throughout the United States. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
But there may be few more fascinating, and regularly shifting, areas of judicial juggling than that of the application of the doctrine of fair use under United States copyright law. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am by Editors
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am by Editors
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am by Chris Neumeyer
Federal Circuit Decides Egyptian GoddessOn Monday, September 22, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided the much anticipated design patent case – Egyptian Goddess v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am by Florian Mueller
In its response to Apple's effort to win a permanent injunction in the United States against many Samsung products over multiple intellectual property rights, Samsung argues that the sales ban sought by Apple -- and denied by Judge Koh in December despite a multiplicity of infringement findings by a California jury in August 2012 -- "would not stop any ongoing infringement, for Samsung has either discontinued the accused products or designed around any infringing… [read post]