Search for: "Fischer v Fischer"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
And in Bank of America v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
Bertone, 15 AD3d 326; Matter of Fischer-Holland v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:54 pm
Part V illustrates fallacies of narration, including fallacies of anachronism and presentism, that too often create fruitless investigations and provide ahistorical answers. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 1:30 pm
Part V illustrates fallacies of narration, including fallacies of anachronism and presentism, that too often create fruitless investigations and provide ahistorical answers. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:46 am
Fischer, 687 F.3d 514 (2d Cir. 2012), nearly 20 years after Rivas’s conviction, ,the Second Circuit re-instated the habeas petition. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
The Court of Appeals reverses, the conviction stands, and Smith remains in jail.The case is Fischer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Fischer, 2015 U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:46 am
Fischer, decided on March 11. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
James Mortimer, Street v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
Weiss v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 3:19 pm
Fischer, 2011 WL 6254091 (W.D. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
Of course you want to sue Time Warner Cable. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
In Selmek v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:14 am
Supreme Court granted cert. in the case now captioned Ohio v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am
” Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the East Valley Tribune) discusses Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
