Search for: "Greenfield, Matter Of#"
Results 561 - 580
of 758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 11:12 am
Reliance on this statement as assurance that final settlement had occurred was, under the circumstances here, unreasonable as a matter of law. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:20 pm
Each law firm has its own unique firm culture:Dan Hull explains why doing great work isn't the only thing which matters to client satisfaction. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
” Scott Greenfield and I hatched a plan for that day that was certain to get their attention. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:28 pm
Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield’s remarks prior to the adoption highlighted the choice now before the global community—to govern AI or risk being governed by it. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:49 am
(I’ll leave to Scott Greenfield the question of the wisdom of hiring a criminal-defense lawyer based on the recommendation of people who can’t even keep themselves out of jail.) [read post]
31 May 2010, 4:09 am
(Via Greenfield.) [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
" Particularly since I'm not New York-barred, Scott's perspective on this matter is particularly beneficial for me. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
If your product involves sharing at its core, virality will matter and you should focus on optimizing it. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 12:57 pm
A clear violation of his ethical obligations.And then there's the matter of going on the air to declare his client guilty. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:45 pm
Even so, greenfield shale developments are still exploration. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 4:19 am
To the extent anyone gives a crap, it’s begrudging (While I don’t agree with Greenfield, he’s prolific). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:18 pm
Basically, he tells us that it doesn’t matter that he lost because his client was guilty anyway. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 6:17 pm
K1297 - Product liability - medical devices - defense of preemptionMark Herrman and Jim Beck present Why Does Preemption Matter? [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:59 am
No matter what you do you have to be great. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:56 am
I'm not saying we shouldn't have criminal laws or that there should be no consequence for those responsible for horrific acts of violence (or for those responsible for relatively minor offenses, for that matter). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:41 am
The message is left: “Greenfield, this is bzzzgropppth, My husband got hjustttshsssssh. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:12 pm
Scott Greenfield gave as good an explanation as anyone of why he likely did it and why it made sense strategically. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 4:56 am
Linda Thomas-Greenfield said yesterday. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
If the evidence does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, then it doesn’t matter whether they did it or not, they don’t deserve to be convicted. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:57 am
A few weeks ago, Scott Greenfield bemoaned the demise of quality of continuing legal education (CLE) (if there ever was such a thing). [read post]
