Search for: "Herring v. Reed"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am
The majority (Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Hamblen) hold that section 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies to claims for the restitution of money paid under a mistake of law, with time beginning to run when the claimant discovers or could with reasonable diligence have discovered their mistake in the sense of recognising that they have a worthwhile claim. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:26 am
In 1975, the United States Supreme Court held in Weinberger v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
—— Fy, what an indirect and peevish course Is this of hers? [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
HONEY BERK, Appellee. 3rd District.Attorney's fees -- Offer of judgment -- Ambiguities in “apostrophe-challenged” offer of judgment render the judgment unenforceable -- Final judgment reversedCHARLYN BRADSHAW and KENNETH BRADSHAW, her husband, Appellants, v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Reed, 500 U.S. 478 (1991). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:09 pm
Reed v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:52 am
* Carolina has recently survived her second year at SMU Law School and is a Gray Reed summer associate. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:23 pm
In recent appellate opinion, a catastrophic injury case, Yiallouro v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
“Plaintiffs had the burden to show that had a different warning been given, this patient would not have used the product that caused her injury. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:00 am
On August 18, 2023, the Fifth Circuit sitting en banc in Hamilton v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Here on the Reed Smith side of the blog, three of our core contributors are located in Pennsylvania and California. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:08 am
” “In 2019, Reed Smith began getting anonymous correspondence that seemed like “the musings of a disgruntled person who was following” the Providence v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
See Mulraney v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
Some more from Justice Brennan in Garrison v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 2:16 am
Cotter v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs is the attraction. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15–16 March 2016. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Mr Jeremy Reed, counsel for the claimants in both actions, contended that the words “technical or commercial information” in the definition of “intellectual property” should be understood as if it read “protectable technical or commercial information”relying upon the House of Lords decision in Douglas v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:17 am
Reed takes the time to look at the genesis of damages. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
Julien v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Valentino v. [read post]
