Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 561 - 580
of 896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 8:28 am
Secretary of State of Energy and Climate Change [20.09.2013], Mansfield County Court, in which District Judge Davies, having heard submissions from both parties, ruled in favour of the Defendant (represented by Nabarro LLP) and held that NIHL is not a disease within the meaning of CPR 45.23 and therefore the 62.5% success fee did not apply. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Schs. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm
Secretary of State (1964), the Supreme Court cases that demolished the Cold War era travel controls that closely mirror today’s watchlists. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm
It is plainly open to them to follow the Secretary of State’s Circular, but compliance with Burnip/Gorry is not their legal responsibility”, the UT found that this was not the case. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm
It is plainly open to them to follow the Secretary of State’s Circular, but compliance with Burnip/Gorry is not their legal responsibility”, the UT found that this was not the case. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
Ten states have joined in AG Harris’ brief, including Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
He held the position from 1947, until 1954, when he left to organize a new medical school department, of Industrial Medicine and Hygiene, in Wayne State University, in Michigan. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
Chemical weapons, it seemed, had been consigned to the dustbin of history, no matter the stockpiles that states continued to hold, especially in the Middle East, right up to today. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:59 am
See Donovan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:30 am
Secretary of State for the proposition that a Provisional Agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia allows appellant Shaker Aamer to invoke international law to challenge the conditions of his confinement. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 1:39 pm
EPIC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:40 pm
Speaking of India’s contentious compulsory licensing order in Natco v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 1:05 am
Citizen v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
For example, the Military Commissions Act of 2009,1 which completely overhauled the Guantánamo Bay military commissions, was passed as Title XVIII of the 2010 NDAA.2 Likewise, the 2011–2013 NDAAs’ detention provisions—the main subject of this book—generated far more controversy and attention than the surrounding thousands of pages of appropriations provisions. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm
Pyle stated that "[tlhe U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm
Access THE QB-Lu research paper on CFC v. [read post]
