Search for: "STATE v. FLOYD"
Results 561 - 580
of 849
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2013, 4:31 am
Municipalities intending to promulgate or amend civil service personnel rules must comply with the provisions of Civil Service Law §20 Floyd v City of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 03772, Appellate Division, First Department Under color of New York City Mayoral Personnel Orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2, the City issued rules allocating certain “ungraded” civil service titles otherwise subject to prevailing wage bargaining under Labor Law §220 to positions… [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:06 am
The Court had previously held that such an exception continued to apply in cases of forfeitures in state court, but AEDPA had not altered federal habeas treatment of state defaults. [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:06 pm
It is now the subject of a class action lawsuit in Floyd v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Welcome, Floyd. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm
In a Q&A document accompanying its Monday announcement of a Statement of Objections (SO) against Google's Motorola's pursuit of injunctions against Apple (and creation of an agreement under allegedly-abusive circumstances) the European Commission stated in no uncertain terms its disagreement with some of the terms certain German courts have in recent years imposed on implementers of FRAND standards if they wanted to avoid sales bans under the Orange-Book-Standard framework. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:29 pm
The government is prohibited from depriving life, liberty or property without due process of law, but is now doing exactly that by attacking Floyd County educators right to a fair hearing that is required under the charter agreement, Floyd County Board of Education policy, Georgia state law, and the Constitution. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Mr Justice Floyd presided over proceedings -– and he also presided over Schütz v Werit at first instance. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm
The case, Floyd v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:16 pm
First, the Advocate-General's Opinion in the Amazon.com reference from the Austrian courts (see Eleonora's excellent summary here) and second, the CJEU's decision in the ITV v TV Catchup reference from Mr Justice Floyd in the English courts.Background For those not up to speed, broadcasters including ITV alleged that TV Catchup had infringed the copyright in its broadcasts by communicating those broadcasts to the public through a process of electronic transmission. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
Earlier this month, Judge Scheindlin certified Ligon as a class action case and consolidated consideration of remedies in Ligon with the remedies in the broader class action suit against stop-and-frisk, Floyd v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:51 am
Arguing for respondent Floyd Perkins, Chad Readler faced this question immediately in his argument; he suggested that the district court had misapplied the standard for assessing actual innocence under Schlup v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:50 pm
Landis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
At first instance Mr Justice Floyd found the patent valid (under the headings of novelty, inventive step and sufficiency) although he construed the claim in one respect (the meaning of " a medicament for the treatment of a non-neoplastic disease or disorder characterised by undesirable excessive neovascularisation") in a manner different from that put forward by either the claimants or the defendant, stating: I see no reason to recast the definition either as… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Mr Justice Floyd allowed the proposed amendments to the '881 patent and held the patent to be valid. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:28 am
According to U.S. ex rel Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:18 pm
In Holland v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
(Yeah, Gamso, you've made this point before, too.)In Kansas v. [read post]
