Search for: "State v. Judge"
Results 561 - 580
of 81,248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2024, 8:07 am
City of Roswell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:20 am
In Steadman v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:49 am
To ensure that Natale’s participation did not violate New York State Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7(a), the “attorney-witness rule,” U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 5:33 am
Filed by Judge Nina Pillard, the decision stated that while the First Amendment protects the right to read, it does not guarantee unrestricted access to all reading materials one might desire. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Wexler v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:24 am
Stated differently, at bottom, the F AC alleges that Ms. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
" Eventually, in SFFA v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 2:41 am
Simply put, the so-called “presumptive reciprocity” means that, unless proven otherwise, reciprocity is presumed to exist between the requested State and the State of origin, to the extent permitted by domestic law of the requested State.[3] Here, “proven otherwise” refers to any existing case where the judgments from the requested State have been refused enforcement in the State of origin on the ground of the lack of reciprocity. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2024) EWHC 1989 (Admin) We first saw UO and Redbridge in this judicial review of an unlawful housing needs assessment (HNA) and suitability decision. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:11 am
Case Citation: NetChoice LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” Pace William Riker—who (in)famously argued that, “if in the United States one disapproves of racism, one should disapprove of federalism”—LaCroix reveals how state power was wielded in service of abolition and Black freedom. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 11:52 pm
The judge accepted – provided Mr Powlesland made an affirmation rather than swore an oath. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
This dates back to the antebellum Supreme Court decision in Prigg v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 11:22 am
Chief US District Judge Mark E. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” (p. 60) Martin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 3:14 am
There are two important passages of the judges’ rationale. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm
Learning to teach Milliken v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 1:51 pm
Raimondo, overturning the Chevron doctrine and holding that judges must exercise independent judgment when interpreting statutes. [read post]
