Search for: "State v. Lilly" Results 561 - 580 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
PatentsIn a two-part report, the AmeriKat exfoliates the decision in L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173, in which Mr Justice Carr bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Part I and Part II)Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Bexis
 “Fraud on the market” isn’t a state-law claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
Eli Lilly and Company - employment issues, more coming Marietta Squibb v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Similarly, Justice de Montigny considered the file history in Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
Eli Lilly & Co., 2010 WL 3489366, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:18 pm
Eli Lilly, 119 F.3d at 1568. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]