Search for: "State v. Rhodes" Results 561 - 580 of 1,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:27 am by Eugene Volokh
Wilkerson to ask about the case, he stated that he didn’t authorize its filing, and didn’t know who the ostensible defendant (Wilkerson) was. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
The AG’s office had concluded “that an outright ban on the possession of electronic arms within the state … would likely not pass constitutional muster” in light of Caetano v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:02 pm
By reply email, Respondent stated that he would repay Ms. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Such decisions, along with the decision by Rhode Island to boycott the Convention entirely, significantly enhanced the prospects of cohesion among the disproportionately pro-nationalist delegates who did show up. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  The states had also vetoed the most reasonable national-level tax. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Limoges was an employee of the State of Rhode Island as an Assistant Administrator to Facilities and Operations. [read post]
            Department of State (DOS): DOS Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR) § 652.239-71—This clause notes that contractor failure to comply could result in contract termination. 48 CFR 652.239-71(m). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  I cannot imagine that its proposed amendments would in fact gain the support of the constitutionally-required three-quarters of the states (which means, further, the support of at least 75 separate legislative houses in the same 38 states, assuming that one of them is Nebraska). [read post]