Search for: "State v. Temple" Results 561 - 580 of 726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
It is therefore unclear whether advocacy demonstrating reasons for other outcomes is a successful strategy for debiasing.Greg Mandel (Professor, Temple University Law School, USA) summarized his original research on hindsight bias in patent law.[7]Mandel found, in an experimental study with mock jurors, a strong effect of hindsight bias. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Joining The Circle: capturing the zeitgeist of ‘Big Tech’ companies, social media speech and privacy, Inner Temple, London, Wednesday 23 May 2018. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “Court Permits Insurer To Appoint Counsel At Insurer’s Expense: Temple Insurance Company v Sazwan, 2018 ABQB 156” – “In 2018, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench (Court) handed down a decision that provided a precedent for an insured to choose its preferred counsel that the insurers will have the onus of financing. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:34 am
The plaintiffs in the case of Betty Nestlehutt and Bruce Nestlehutt v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
”   These two articles, along with the recent New Hampshire Supreme Court decision in Baxter v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This distinction is not clearly established in the preliminary hearing in Appleby v BBC and Guardian (not that it needed to be). [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Chambers (1983) 463 U.S. 783; County of Allegheny v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat)   United States US General U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Supreme Court’s divided opinions in June Medical Services v. [read post]