Search for: "Wells v. Hand"
Results 561 - 580
of 18,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
I don't think I buy the crucial arguments for either side in Jones v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:37 am
On the one hand, multiple DUIs are incredibly bad. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am
Pa. 2012). [8] Boyle v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 2:15 pm
I think this case is well worth a few blog posts. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:56 pm
(3) The Judge erred in saying that the concept of "without prejudice" was well known outside English law [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Myers might well have thought that she'd have a sympathetic panel here. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
IX, § 5; Wells v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:56 am
The recent case of Community Care Center of Aberdeen v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 10:31 am
Take the recent case of Peng v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 4:10 am
In a judgment handed down on 20 August 2014 in the case Yeo v Times Newspapers ([2014] EWHC 2853 (QB)) Mr Justice Warby decided that the trial of a defamation action brought against the Sunday Times by senior Conservative MP Tim Yeo will take place without a jury. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
This post discusses the law governing when parties in a criminal trial may discuss issues of race, as well as emerging strategies for mitigating the effects of implicit racial bias on decision-makers. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
In June 2011, the Court upheld the Council’s decision and dismissed the gallery owner’s appeal: Tenodi v Blue Mountains City Council [2011] NSWLEC 1183 (21 June 2011). [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:24 pm
Most of the judgment in Joined Cases C-231/06 to C-233/06 Office national des pensions v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
On 4 September 2019 the Administrative Court (Haddon-Cave LJ and Swift J) handed down judgment in the case of R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of the South Wales Police [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:36 pm
Hand Held Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:04 pm
Via Law and Magic I found this post on Deceptology discussing the case of Gunderson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:11 am
Zurich thought the claim might well be a wrong ‘un, and indeed pleaded that it was. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:36 pm
On the other hand, it did succeed at first instance and Judge Moloney may well have reached a different conclusion if dealing with a less sophisticated client. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
Two of the four patents it originally asserted were dismissed, and the other two could finally have gone to trial in the District of Massachusetts this summer, but the court granted Google's motion to consolidate another Skyhook v. [read post]
