Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 5841 - 5860
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 5:00 am
"**The Court of Appeals decision notes that "New York's public policy strongly disfavors the receipt of state pensions by persons also receiving state salaries, citing §150 of the Civil Service Law as establishing New York State's general public policy against the simultaneous receipt of a state pension and a state salary. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:00 am
Watson’s professor gave him a C for the paper, calling the whole idea a “dead letter” issue and saying it would never become part of the Constitution. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:22 pm
S. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
” Pennzoil–Quaker State Co. v.United States, 511 F.3d 1365, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:49 am
Section 377.60(b) states only that standing exists if stepchildren (or parents): “were dependent on the decedent. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:12 pm
A recent example of the court’s flexibility can be seen in Arnold J’s recent judgment in FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:23 am
Flea’s Flea Market in Toronto (see Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:23 am
Flea’s Flea Market in Toronto (see Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
App. 2006); United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:47 am
B. [read post]
2 May 2017, 7:38 pm
On appeal from the denial of the habeas application, the Fifth District Court of Appeals agreed with defense counsel’s position—that the Bullard v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:01 pm
B. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm
(Canfield v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:21 am
As alluded to in my prior post Sandeen and Seaman's article casts doubt on the Federal Circuit's bald suggestion in TianRui v. [read post]
