Search for: "Marshall v. Marshall" Results 5881 - 5900 of 6,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2024, 6:16 am by Jeralyn
That moment when the character of the stop changes from a traffic stop to a criminal inquiry is called the "Rodriguez moment", after the 2015 Supreme Court decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Judges believe that they have argued persuasively for a result, not by correctly marshaling statistical and scientific concepts, but by relying upon precedents erroneously arrived at by other judges in earlier cases. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
David Forte, Stephen Lazarus, and Kevin O'Neill (Cleveland-Marshall), and me, supporting a motion to dismiss. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
It is not hyperbole to recall the trenchant words of Chief Justice John Marshall: “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:34 am by Paul Horwitz
 Of course, the starting point for many con law classes is Marbury v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
 This alleged scheme came in a case called Jones v. [read post]