Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 16,407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 4:44 am
The United States has made no representations or promises as to a specific sentence. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Consider the recent decision in EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am
Wells had no protocol, no pre-stated commitment to which years in the dataset he would use, and no pre-stated statistical analysis plan. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:53 pm
In Medžlis Islamske Zajednice Brčko and Others v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:07 am
But a great many segregation policies would likely have been enacted nonetheless, since blacks were a minority and the white majority in those states was strongly racist. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
KNAPIK, PLAINTIFF, V. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
Sometimes the focus is on drawing out previously neglected aspects of cases which have been – undeservedly – assigned minor importance. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 5:30 am
The victim got back up and told police he stated “You wanna replay that? [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:28 am
” Wax v Riverview Cemetery Co., 41 Del 424, 436 [Del. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
Chase believed the 14th Amendment barred such discrimination by a state. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 9:20 am
Whitman's Hitler’s American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Mapp v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 11:16 am
LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:22 pm
The case, Utah v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm
R. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:18 am
A minor point, perhaps, but at some point, given all the other documented flaws with the book, one wonders whether one can trust the footnotes to support the text. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:31 pm
Today, in a short published opinion, United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 6:33 am
The Supreme Court strikes down this law as unconstitutional.The case is Packingham v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, William Koski discusses Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
