Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 7,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
The Court accepted the appeals — under the general title, McConnell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:17 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm
But that record has evaporated thanks to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:09 am
Wilkes trial, the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In the 2012 decision United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:27 am
The Law Library cooperates with the Oklahoma State Court Network (OSCN) to provide online Wyoming Supreme Court opinions back to 1990. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 9:47 am
Crossover Law EnforcementBrown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 9:47 am
Crossover Law EnforcementBrown v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Try “cooperative federalism”: you have to read the Compact Clause and the Contract Clause out of the Constitution (as the Supreme Court has in fact done), and those are just the proverbial canaries. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm
That ruling came a year after the Court, in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 12:51 am
[A brief search of some other jurisdictions reveals that this type of decision can be challenged under the law of some other jurisdictions: United States federal and state law and German law, for example]. #23, Han Yawen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:38 am
See Pruitt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
