Search for: "National Labor Relations Board, The" Results 5961 - 5980 of 8,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 8:43 am by Sam Favate
Employers may have to subtly rewrite rules regarding what employees may discuss with co-workers in the wake of a recent decision from the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:43 pm by pgbarnes
Workers continue to lose ground in federal courts, where judges are disregarding a ruling by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) that says companies cannot require workers to sign away their right to bring class action arbitrations and lawsuits. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 10:33 am by David Freedman
On July 30, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a 2-1 decision in the case of In re Banner Health System, holding that the employer violated Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) by requiring that participants in internal investigations maintain confidentiality. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
Recently, the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) Acting General Counsel claimed that the employment at-will disclaimers in two employee handbooks "chilled or interfered with its employees' exercise of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (the Act) to engage in protected concerted activity. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:48 pm by charlesakrugel
The dealership reacted by firing the employee and the former employee got the National Labor Relations Board involved in settling the dispute and rewriting the company’s social media guidelines. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Brennan W. Bolt
NLRB Dismisses ULP Charges Against Hawaiian Telcom: Pacific Business News reprots that the National Labor Relations Board dismissed unfair labor practice charges filed by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 1357 against Hawaiian Telcom. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm by Ian G. Nanos
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by Michelle Capezza
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:00 pm by Michelle Capezza
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:59 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:59 am by Epstein Becker Green
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:53 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Aug. 23, 2012), upholding the National Labor Relations Board's decision in Dana Corporation, 356 NLRB No. 49 (2010), finding that a pre-recognition framework agreement between Dana Corporation and the United Auto Workers did not violate the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:52 pm by nflatow
Concepcion, the National Labor Relations Board issued a ruling that gave hope to those seeking to hold their employers accountable. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:35 am by Katie Carder McCoy
A recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rejected an employer's standard practice of seeking confidentiality in its workplace investigations. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:34 am by Brennan W. Bolt
NLRB to Decide if Professors are Labor or Management: Marcus Schwarz of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that the National Labor Relations Board has asked for briefs in Point Park University's dispute with its teachers where the issue is whether the professors can organize or not. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:57 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Utility Workers File ULPs Against Power Company: Brian Dowling of the Hartford Courant reports that unions representing employees at Connecticut Light & Power filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board alleging that the utility company tried to keep employees from an informational picket. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:33 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  A board certified labor and employment attorney widely known for her extensive and creative knowledge and experienced with these and other employment, employee benefit and compensation matters, Ms. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:37 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Under GINA, employers, employment agencies, labor organizations and joint labor-management committees face significant liability for violating the sweeping nondiscrimination and confidentiality requirements of GINA concerning their use, maintenance and disclosure of genetic information. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:39 pm by AALRR
”  In this regard, we note that the National Labor Relations Board has exclusive jurisdiction over claims of alleged unfair labor practices, and the court’s decision in this case is not a precedential decision as to whether Medeiros did nor did not have a right to union representation during the meeting under the National Labor Relations Act The court concluded, also, that Medeiros was not entitled to rely on… [read post]