Search for: "*fail v. Sears, Roebuck and Co"
Results 41 - 60
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548 (Fed. [read post]
Cert. petitions pending in front-load washer cases: Whirlpool v. Glaser and Sears, Roebuck v. Butler
11 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Glaser, No. 13-431; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:13 am
Sears, Roebuck and Co., et al., No. 3:13-CV-0468-D (N.D. [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:39 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:00 am
In Dailey v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 358 So.2d 926, 930 (La.1978); see also La. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 386 F.3d 21, 35 (1st Cir. 2004)(holding that trial court erred in allowing crossexamination and final argument on expert witness’s supposed failure to produce all working notes and videotaped recordings while conducting tests, when objecting party never made such document requests). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:43 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
In that case, Lisa Learmonth sued Sears, Roebuck and Co. after she was in a collision with one of the company's vans near Philadelphia, Miss., in 2005. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
In that case, Lisa Learmonth sued Sears, Roebuck and Co. after she was in a collision with one of the company's vans near Philadelphia, Miss., in 2005. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 35 Conn. 687, 406 A.2d 1254 (1979) (cited in Cassisi, 396 So.2d at 1150) (emphasis supplied).Cases involving complex pharmaceutical products, which carry inherent risks, are inapposite. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:24 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542,1548 (Fed. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 624 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2010), wrote a blistering opinion that discussed the extortionate nature of class action suits and is likely to be frequently quoted extensively by defense counsel in the future. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:51 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 10-2407, Slip op. (7th Cir. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:31 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008), observing that by ensuring that the class action is premised on the realistic prospect of a remedy that the class members could not otherwise obtain, the court is also protecting the interests of absent class members, who may have different interests than those of class action lawyers who want to obtain a fee for providing the same or similar relief. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:48 am
Initially, the major investor and the major advertiser on the site was Sears Roebuck. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
In almost seven intervening years, the court has failed to address the issue squarely, although not for want of trying. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:16 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 417 F.3d 789, 804 (7th Cir. 2005).Xodus simply failed to introduce enough convincing evidence that Wackenhut was aware of his religion which provides an important lesson to most any plaintiff in employment cases: you must let the employer know of your protected class! [read post]
