Search for: "All-Of-Innovation GmbH" Results 41 - 60 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
The German Schering AG was Berlex, Inc. in North America while Schering-Plough was Essex Pharma GmbH in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:50 am by Diane Tweedlie
It therefore corresponds to life experience that all technical innovations are legally protected before the vehicles are handed over.b) There is also a strong interest on the customer side to be able to use the vehicle in question at will. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 11:38 am by Eleonora Rosati
”That provision, in light of the latest interpretation given by the CJEU, “excludes protection under the law on Community designs for features of appearance of a product, where considerations other than the need for that product to fulfil its technical function, in particular those related to the visual aspect, have not played any role in the choice of those features, even if other designs fulfilling the same function exist” (Doceram GmbH v CeramTec GmbH,… [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
The use of cloud storage is near ubiquitous these days, with both companies and consumers using it at increasing amounts to store both their private data and even multimedia content, making it accessible without having all of the data copied onto a given device at all times. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
The use of cloud storage is near ubiquitous these days, with both companies and consumers using it at increasing amounts to store both their private data and even multimedia content, making it accessible without having all of the data copied onto a given device at all times. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
  All of the companies but one in the Top 50 are up over the previous year, most shattering records and many posting double-digit percentage gains.Big gainers in 2010 include:Apple, +94%Qualcomm, +84%NEC, +74%SAP, +70GM Global Technology, +68%Hynix Semiconductor, +65%Silverbrook Research, +58%3M Innovative Properties, +53%Toyota, +50%Brother, +45%Hon Hai Precision Industry, +44%LG Electronics, +40% US companies also reclaimed the lead on the total number of U.S.… [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:34 am
A generic top-level domain is a top-level domain that is not a geographic or national designation (for example, ".com", ".org" and ".net" are all examples of historic gTLDs). [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You have come to the right place (IP Dragon) Court protects transliteration of well-known international enterprise name (International Law Office) How to go to China for innovation (China Law Blog)   Costa Rica Costa Rica approves Free Trade Agreement between US, Central America and Dominican Republic (CAFTA) (IP tango)   Europe EU judges on Community patent and court (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) European IP forum considers standards-setting (Managing… [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:32 am by Bob Ambrogi
Speakers: Benjamin Polster, Corporate Legal, Process & Technology Management, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, and Gregory Culloo, Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 1:16 pm by Gene Quinn
Periodically, we take a look at some innovative companies on IPWatchdog.com as a part of what we call the Companies We Follow series. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Vincent LoTempio
But even with all the suppoed deficiencies of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, foreign and US corporations want to protect their innovations and have filed a record number of applications this year. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:11 am by Nedim Malovic
For instance, in Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (T-668/19), EU: T:2021:420, the EU General Court considered that, the assessment of the distinctiveness of sound marks has to be made as to the ‘resonance’ of the mark and is not subject to a ‘significant departure of the norm’ test developed for, eg, shape marks.In the present case, the fact that shades or nuances ranging from copper to brown or… [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., MAXPLANCK-INNOVATION GMBH, WHITEHEADINSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH,MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,AND ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.Of background, the initial action involved an attempt by theUniversity of Utah to correct inventorship on the “Tuschl Patents”.Because the action was against the University of Massachusetts,a legal question involved jurisdiction in an action between two state entities. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 Alberto's summary of the choicest posts from last week, which should help bring you up to speed if you missed anything, reads like this:* One for all and all for one: here comes more mirroring of EU and national trade mark lawValentina provides a useful summary of the major innovations of the European Trade Mark Reform draft just issued by the EU Council [on which the IPKat recently reported here].* Hello goodbye: no estoppel as licensee gets the… [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
One major innovation is the mandatory annual recordal with the ACA of all trademarks, copyrights and trade names for goods imported into Kenya. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
Many innovator biopharma companies have thus developed and/or are developing biosimilars. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics GmbH, No. 14-CV-585 (AJN), 2018 WL 4253181 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
* Aldi and the likelihood of consumer confusion: a lesson in self-interest Case T-240/13 Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
This, in part, confirms the point that innovative technologies that work in some sectors do not necessarily do so in legal ones, which should be a warning for publishers. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Duh. - ECJ ruling in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (IPKat) (Managing IP) Frisdranken/Red Bull dispute is referred to ECJ: Frisdranken Industrie Winters v Red Bull GmbH (Class 46) A serious reference or is somebody winding us up? [read post]