Search for: "Amin v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Apart from its import for U.S. detention policy generally, the development, if true, may have bearing on the factual underpinnings in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
Div. 1998) (treating the law as covering "a discussion during recreational activities outside of the workplace in which her political affiliations became an issue") and El-Amine v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
Algérie Charissa Fawole, Revisiting Michelo Hansungule and others (on behalf of the Children of Northern Uganda) v Uganda: a case commentary Prosper Maguchu, When to push the envelope? [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Mohammed Mark Amin, Robert Reza Amin, Michael Mahmood Amin, Sam Saeed Pirnazar, Mary Teresa Coley, and Ali Tashakori Case number: 12-cv-3960 (United States District Court for the Central District of California) Case filed: May 8, 2012 Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 1, 2012 08/01/2012 10/30/2012 2012-81 In the Matter of Harbinger Capital Partners, LLC … [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 7:01 am
This speech is thus entitled to even greater First Amendment protection than the speech at issue in [United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
Dr Amin was the consultant for Mr Nassery during his hospital admissions. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm
” Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Following the recent filing of a petition for rehearing en banc by the detainees in the Allaithi v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:01 am
Article 4 reflects the system of primacy that characterizes relations between states and the 2 ad hoc international criminal tribunals, and that stands in contrast with the principle of complementarity that governs the International Criminal Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:09 pm
In Blanco v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Novartis Grimsby Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm
Supp. 33, 37 (D.D.C. 1988), where the district court stated that “the reexamination statute does not contemplate a ‘reex- amination’ of the sufficiency of a disclosure. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
McIlrath, No. 07-1266 Sentence for traveling across state lines to have sex with a minor is affirmed where: 1) remarks of the judge at sentencing discharged his duty to consider not only the sentencing guidelines, but [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 6:02 am
Div. 2001) ("romantic relationships are not protected 'recreational activities'"); State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:36 pm
ELKHORN CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Wyoming corporation.ELKHORN CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Wyoming corporation v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:13 pm
AIR1980 SC 691, Jagannath Amin v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:08 am
Div. 2001) ("romantic relationships are not protected 'recreational activities'"); State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm
El-Amine v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 1:11 pm
Mahendra Amin allegedly took this unnecessary, aggressive, and irreversible step to treat minor health concerns that could be addressed with far less invasive procedures. [read post]
