Search for: "BELL v. MOORE" Results 41 - 60 of 122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm by Michael Geist
B is for Bell’s targeted advertising program that involves the use of consumer location and browsing habits. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:39 pm by Michael Geist
B is for Bell’s targeted advertising program that involves the use of consumer location and browsing habits. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
PLIVA, Inc., 720 F.3d 739, 744 (8th Cir. 2013); Bell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
  As the US Supreme Court remarked in The Telephone Cases, if it were true that Bell’s patent granted him a practical monopoly, this would “show more clearly the great importance of his discovery, but it will not invalidate his patent” 126 US 1, 535. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
Both are commodities with steadily falling prices, per Moore’s law, in today’s economy. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On 28 January 2013, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick, Aikens and Black LJJ) will give judgment in the libel costs case of Henry v NGN. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Glenn
With respect to monopoly power, the potential case of FTC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version:  March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation The PCC has not upheld Bell Pottinger Group’s complaint against the Independent for publishing reports on the company’s public relations and lobbying methods. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:29 am by Alfred Brophy
 In re Moore, a 1976 decision in the North Carolina Supreme Court, quoted Buck v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:58 am by Matthew Nelson
While the gaze of the eDiscovery community has been firmly transfixed on the unfolding drama in the Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]