Search for: "Board of Education v. Commission on Civil Rights"
Results 41 - 60
of 505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:11 am
Gloucester County School Board is the meaning of a 1964 federal civil rights law that outlaws discrimination “because of sex” in federally funded education. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
It is strongly supported by a large coalition of civil rights and consumer groups. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the justices held 7-2 that, by failing to exhibit religious neutrality when it required a Christian baker to make a cake for a same-sex wedding, a state commission violated the baker’s free-exercise rights. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:41 am
No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, the Appellate Division rejected this defense as well, commenting that “Contrary to the defendants' contention, an action commenced pursuant to Civil Service Law §102(2) is an action ‘to vindicate a public interest’ to which the notice of claim requirement in Education Law §3813(1) does not apply. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, because in both cases petitioners seek to weaponize the First Amendment in order to weaken the infrastructure that has promoted an [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:00 am
… Commission scolaire de Laval et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 5:39 am
Justice Jaynee LaVecchia, writing for the court in In re Robbinsville Board of Education v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission: such laws compel governmental orthodoxy. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
New York Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:15 am
The prison has refused to let him use the men’s restroom or to cover his medically necessary transition-related health care, so Jesse, with help from the ACLU, has filed a complaint of gender identity discrimination before the Iowa Civil Rights Commission. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Determining the status and rights of an employee in the public service terminated from his or her employmentHanson v Crandell, 2016 NY Slip Op 05604, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Supreme Court dismissed William A. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 3:30 am
Clayton County that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender has discriminated based on sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
In Davenport v. [read post]
