Search for: "Board of Review v. Second Judicial District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am
In a published opinion filed on January 17, 2024, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 5) reversed a trial court judgment overturning a mitigated negative declaration (MND) and requiring an EIR for a 42-single family home project; instead, the Court of Appeal held the petitioners’ action should have been dismissed as time-barred and that the trial court erred in overruling the demurrers of respondent City of Los Angeles and the real… [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am
Variances, waivers, zoning exceptions, site plans, development orders, and rezoning are all specific examples of quasi-judicial decisions: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1807174/lee-county-v-sunbelt-equities/ https://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1487683.html Certiorari Review Before we get into the details of filing a petition for certiorari review, let’s examine some unique characteristics of this appellate… [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
In a published decision filed June 12, 2018, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 6) held that the same broad definition of a “project” that mandates more extensive CEQA review of activities undertaken or approved by public agencies also applies in determining the scope of statutory exemptions that serve to exempt certain projects from CEQA review. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am
Decided on June 12, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department ALAN D. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm
The court then rejected the union’s argument that the district court may nevertheless have authority to review certain plainly unlawful acts by the FLRA under the Supreme Court’s decision in Leedom v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:49 pm
§1252(a)(4), “CAT orders … may not be reviewed in district courts, even via habeas corpus, and may be reviewed only in the courts of appeals. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:54 pm
District for the Suffolk District II/Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) held that "plaintiffs are attempting to resolve a sales tax dispute by using consumer and common law remedies rather than the procedure set forth by the Legislature [in the Revenue and Taxation Code]. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:59 am
San Mateo County Community College District, Case No. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
By Elena Eyber, J.D.A registered public accounting firm filed a complaint in federal district court in Texas, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to stop the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) from enforcing an investigative Accounting Board Demand (ABD) authorized by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on July 10, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Decided on July 10, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:15 am
§1071 provides review of a Trademark Trial and Appeals Board's decision in the Federal Circuit or a District Court, and any meritorious interest brought before an administrative proceeding, must carry over into a review of said proceeding. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 7:05 am
Judicial review is fairly circumscribed. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
The Board overruled its 1948 decision in NLRB v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
Despite its right to appeal, Hargis did not seek judicial review of the TTAB’s decision in the Federal Circuit or district court. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Decided on May 26, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department HECTOR D. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Decided on May 26, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department HECTOR D. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
Court for the N. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
*The court explained that judicial review of an administrative determination made after a hearing at which evidence is taken is limited to consideration of whether that determination is supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
