Search for: "Bounds v. Barnett" Results 41 - 60 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
Barnett of USC Gould School of Law—the eighth entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium—are developed in greater detail in “Regulatory Rents: An Agency-Cost Analysis of the FTC Rulemaking Initiative,” a chapter in the forthcoming book FTC’s Rulemaking Authority, which will be published by Concurrences later this year. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:28 am by Larry
First off, judges of the same court are not bound by each other's decisions. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallIn 2007, Professor Jack Balkin of Yale Law School shocked the academic world by arguing that Roe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm by Ilya Somin
By the following year, a district court judge had cited Barnett in his opinion striking down health care reform, and Barnett himself had left behind his March 2010 conclusion that the Supreme Court would need to risk its credibility in a politically charged case, Bush v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Article IV territorial officers hold "Office[s] under the Authority of the United States," and are bound by the Sinecure Clause. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”Similarly, in his 2005 opinion for the Court in Kelo v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Judge Kavanaugh’s Activist Vision of Administrative Law September 4, 2018 | Robert V. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of  Madden v Midland, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
   Table of Contents and Excerpt from Rzeslawski's article on the implications of Madden v Midland for post-crash consumer remedies against predatory lending that occurred years earlier  Madden v. [read post]