Search for: "Calhoun v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2020, 12:56 pm
| Furry thoughts on Sky v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:50 am
Calhoun, and Daniel Webster--all of whom figure prominently in the book-- together with an unfurled scroll labeled “Constitution of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Calhoun. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:08 am
A loophole in the drafting of last year’s legislation made its application (including the Commission’s service as the central collector for sales/use taxes on remote sales) contingent on the Supreme Court of the United States ruling the South Dakota sales tax law in Wayfair was constitutional. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, engineered largely by Henry Clay, temporarily settled the issue of where slavery would be permitted in the United States, establishing the Mason-Dixon Line as the boundary between free and slave states. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:19 am
On April 1, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the case of Maurice Walker v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 9:45 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Taha &Sohaib Khan, Charity Disparity: The Challenge of Applying Religious Law on Zakat in the United States, (Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2018).Michael A. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:20 pm
Calhoun, Jason R. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:35 am
So Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630; Jackson, J., dissenting in Beauharnais v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
The law expressly provides, however, that Act No. 5 “shall apply to all taxable periods beginning on or after the date of the final ruling of the United States Supreme Court in [South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
She offers no evidence that he ever read Calhoun or Davidson. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:10 pm
In Day v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 2:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling has no impact on the core federal claim in the lawsuit, the allegations that the districts have violated the Clean Water Act (and the companion Iowa statute) by discharging nitrates via a point source into “Waters of the United States” without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling has no immediate impact on the core federal claim in the lawsuit, the allegations that the districts have violated the Clean Water Act (and the companion Iowa statute) by discharging nitrates via a point source into “Waters of the United States” without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. [read post]
