Search for: "Collins v. THE STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 2,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
§ 794(a)], sue his employer for its alleged failure to accommodate his sleeping disorder [see Collins v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by INFORRM
It has been announced that the President of the King’s Bench Division has appointed Mrs Justice Steyn DBE and Mrs Justice Collins Rice DBE as the Judges Jointly in Charge of the Media and Communications (MAC) List. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
  In some cases, Courts enforce the stale Schedule A as written: In Estate of Connie Collins v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 14 December 2023 there was a set aside application in the case of McGee v Lewis before Collins Rice J. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A defectively noticed meeting can cause corporate chaos: any resulting corporate action runs the heavy risk of being deemed “null and void” (Collins v Telcoa Intl. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
By Alexandra Even Banksy’s anonymity is as a part of his brand as his art. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU Charter: we noted the case… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The libel trial in the case of Blake v Fox begun on 22 November 2023 before Collins Rice J. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am by Frank Cranmer
” The CJEU and religious dress at work On 29 November, the CJEU will hand down judgment in the latest case on religious dress at work: OP v Commune d’Ans Case C‑148/22, which is a request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of McGee v Lewis KB-2023-002435. [read post]