Search for: "Comm. v. Small (Majority Opinion)"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am
Comm’n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (quoting Welch v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:05 am
See, e.g., Metzl v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:51 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
KAGAN, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which ALITO, J., joined. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
KAGAN, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which ALITO, J., joined. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Because small p-values are evidence against the null hypothesis, the one-tailed test seems to produce stronger evidence than its two-tailed counterpart. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Alice v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am
See, e.g., Oxendine v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am
(Eugene Volokh) From ACLU v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
On page 10, the majority decision claims that the whistleblower protection, “is a relatively small part” of SOX. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Comm., 957 P.2d 691 (Wash. 1998) (striking down a law imposing civil liability for knowingly false statements in election campaigns); 281 Care Committee v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Public Disclosure Comm’n v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
& Comm. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:19 pm
” Thus, consider the Supreme Court’s opinion in Thomas v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:39 am
But the guy definitely likes what he likes, and he structures his life around those preferences.The majority opinion affirms the ALJ's finding that Turner's able to work, but Judge Gould dissents, in part based on Turner's lifestyle. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
US v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:23 pm
On May 26, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Deere & Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:43 pm
It takes small steps. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
But the fundamental problem here is that public interest proponents assume that their values or objectives—which, in their opinion, are consistent with the needs and desires of the public—should ultimately triumph within the public policy arena. [read post]
