Search for: "Crown, Cork " Results 41 - 60 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Crown Cork & Seal Co., 335 S.W.3d 126 (2010), 161-163. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:37 pm
Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., (Second District, August 27, 2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 1220, 115 Cal.Rptr.3d 151, 10 Cal. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
The application that led to 5,260,291 took 13 years to allowance. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
For example, we stated that in Crown Cork, “the [Supreme C]ourt ratified the existence of the prosecution laches defense; it did not apply the defense there in the absence of intervening rights,” and we noted that “in General Talking Pictures, the Court rejected the defense of prosecution laches because there was no evidence of intervening public rights. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:09 am by Michael C. Smith
Crown Cork & Seal, and more specifically the concurrence by Justice Willett, who is joined by Justice Lehrmann, and even more specifically footnote 21, in which Justice Willett quotes Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:22 pm by Paralegal
Crown Cork and Seal, the Texas Supreme Court has [...] [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:01 am by Steve Bainbridge
Crown Cork Seal Company (PDF), Justice Don Willett writes: Appropriately weighty principles guide our course. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:18 pm by Joe Consumer
With a headline reading "Justices reject tort reform provision," the Houston Chronicle reported over the weekend that a small part of the brutal 2003 Texas "tort reform" law was struck down by the Texas Supreme Court because its retroactivity provision was "designed to protect one company from a lawsuit brought by a man dying of asbestos exposure," specifically Crown Cork & Seal Inc. of Pennsylvania. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:18 pm by Joe Consumer
With a headline reading "Justices reject tort reform provision," the Houston Chronicle reported over the weekend that a small part of the brutal 2003 Texas "tort reform" law was struck down by the Texas Supreme Court because its retroactivity provision was "designed to protect one company from a lawsuit brought by a man dying of asbestos exposure," specifically Crown Cork & Seal Inc. of Pennsylvania. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:36 pm
Navy for 20 years at a plant that Crown Cork and Seal had purchased. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
Crown, Cork and Seal Company (August 27, 2010) ___Cal.App.4th ___ (Second Dist., Div. [read post]