Search for: "Davis v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
The court rejects Boule’s argument that a First Amendment retaliation claim is similar to the employment-discrimination claim the court allowed in Davis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm by Guest Author
These unitary objections to for-cause protections never swayed a majority of the Court until its 2010 decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:52 am by Brittany Williams
After the defendant was convicted in that court and had appealed to the superior court for a trial de novo, the defendant threatened the witness. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
And absent such a showing, the University is not violating the Constitution under the Davis opinion.It is true that for a while now the Court has held that all racial classifications get strict scrutiny, which is the reason the Court struck down Virginia's ban on interracial marriages in Loving v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Contract Law Contract Drafting California Law     APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Timothy B. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
"[11] "The Court is a public institution and the public has a right to look over our shoulders and see who is seeking relief in public court. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Pagano
For Lynch, the government’s “superior knowledge” about the implications of burden allocation  “reinforces [the] conclusion that the political branches should decide such questions in the first instance. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:43 pm by Paul Krantz
Code, §§ 1001-1001.9, 1001.50-1001.55; Davis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
 In a 15-page decision, Ontario Superior Court Justice Breese Davies ruled that the section is an unjustifiable restriction on Canadians’ right to free speech. [read post]