Search for: "Dean v California" Results 41 - 60 of 888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Doubts About Mitch McConnell’s Health Implicate Important Questions Under the Seventeenth Amendment
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Moore v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Some (Very) Preliminary Musings on the Loper Bright Case Next Term Involving the So-Called Chevron Deference Doctrine
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Huzzah for the Court in Moore v. Harper
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Stanford’s Rick Banks on Race-Based College Admissions SCOTUS Decision
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm by Ralph Richard Banks, Q&A with Sharon Driscoll
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
Legal Aggregate - https://law.stanford.edu/legal-aggregate/
Another Free-Speech Dustup Arising from A Student-Invited-Speaker Event, This One at Pitt, Highlights Recurring Problems at Universities, and in Free Speech Doctrine
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
As the Supreme Court observed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
California versus the Constitution – who can regulate internet accessibility?
26 Jun 2023, 8:30 pm by Richard Hunt
Dean, 342 F.3d 96, 104 (2d Cir. 2003). [read post]
Accessibility Defense - http://accessdefense.com
A Colorado High School Graduation Dispute Illustrates Both the Dangers of the So-Called Government-Speech Doctrine and the Need for Better Education From the Supreme Court and the Legal Academy on First Amendment Basics
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
First Amendment Challenges to Public University DEI Programs
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Why All Good Men and Women Should Read Julie Suk’s After Misogyny
8 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Morrison and the states in Castle Rock v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
More Developments in Moore (v. Harper), and the Central Role Justice Anthony Kennedy Has Played in Addressing the “Independent State Legislature” Theory (ISL) that Moore Raises
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Gore (B v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Court Should Maintain Optionality in Resolving the So-Called “Independent State Legislature” (ISL) Theory by Granting Cert. in Huffman v. Neiman Right Away as the Justices Chew on Whether Moore v. Harper is Moot
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Supremes are reviewing in the pending Moore v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Friendly Advice for Law Schools Seeking to Inculcate Proper Free-Speech Values and Understandings in Light of the Stanford Episode with Judge Kyle Duncan: Part Two in a Series
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
For example, a university taking and announcing a position on the (contested) issue of how easy it should be for foreign graduate students to obtain visas (something that distinctively affects the university itself—and not just its population—as an institution) seems very different to us than weighing in on the correctness of last year’s Second Amendment ruling by the Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s public-carry law or the Court’s Dobbs ruling overturning… [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Law Schools and the 21st Century Lawyer
13 Apr 2023, 3:03 pm by Jackie Gardina, J.D.
In Marbury v. [read post]
The Colleges of Law Blog - https://www.collegesoflaw.edu/blog/
What Law Students Should Take Away from the Stanford Law School Controversy Involving Disruption of a Federal Judge’s Speech: Part One in a Series
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases such as Ward v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Luis Moreno Ocampo, former G&G Global Practice Counsel, and former International Criminal Court first Chief Prosecutor, at Cornell Law School, on Monday March 27, 2023, in “A Conversation on War and Justice – From Judgment at Nuremberg to Argentina 1985 and Beyond.” (Livestream at 12:15 p.m.)
26 Mar 2023, 3:19 am by admin
Managing Partner Neil V. [read post]
Whistleblower News - http://getnicklaw.com/category/whistleblower-news/
"A federal official wrote a parody of Harvard’s attitude toward Asian Americans and shared it with the dean of admissions. Why did a judge try to hide that from the public?"
23 Mar 2023, 1:24 pm
The case, pending before the Supreme Court, it Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
Althouse - https://althouse.blogspot.com
Constitutional Law, Constitutional Litigation, and the Truth About Constitutional Text
14 Mar 2023, 5:17 am by Eric Segall
Article I requires that that there be two senators from every state regardless of population, which means North Dakota and California have the same power in the Senate even though California has 39 million people and North Dakota has roughly 800,000 people. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Can Universities Offer Faculty Race-Based Benefits in Seeking Tenure?
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
 For decades, universities have avoided the type of outright quota the court held unconstitutional in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
UM Law Magazine: Alumnus Pilots One of Largest Aviation Litigation Portfolios in the Nation
3 Mar 2023, 10:35 am by Javier Dominguez
The case, Chason v. [read post]
Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Blog - https://www.podhurst.com/news/
SLS’s Hank Greely Discusses In Vitro Fertilization post-Dobbs
27 Feb 2023, 11:31 am by Henry T. Greely, Q&A with Monica Schreiber
The 49 years of Roe v. [read post]
Legal Aggregate - https://law.stanford.edu/legal-aggregate/