Search for: "Dickinson v. Judges of District Court of Appeal" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
  In a cross-appeal, Amazon argues that the district court should have found the patent unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:48 pm
Becton, Dickinson and Company v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:46 am by Paul F. Prestia
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the court that hears all appeals from trial courts in patent infringement cases, as a plague on the patent system. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit May 25 stiffened the standards for alleged patent infringers to assert an inequitable conduct defense ( Therasense Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
Raising the following question: Did the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit err in restricting district courts' equitable discretion in evaluating patent unenforceability, contrary to this Court's precedent in Keystone Driller, Hazel-Atlas, and Precision Instrument, by applying a rigid test that (a) forecloses district courts from considering the entire circumstantial record; and (b) precludes district courts… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm by Rantanen
"  Slip Op. at 14.This failure to disclose formed the basis of the district court's finding of inequitable conduct, which Calcar sought to overturn on appeal. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am by Jon Gelman
No. 11-1391 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit No. 2:10-cv-10137—Gerald E. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, the EEOC waived on appeal its record-keeping claim and the district court acted within its discretion in denying the EEOC's motion to supplement the record. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 4:46 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Briefing continues in the en banc appeal of TheraSense (Abbott) v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (The three dissenting judges would have dismissed the petition as improvidently granted, and two of them questioned the majority’s ultimate conclusion.) [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Apotex was vacated :In this Hatch-Waxman case, Apotex Inc. and ApotexCorp. appeal from the district court’s claim construction of“extended release coating” and its finding that Apotex’sproduct infringes U.S. [read post]