Search for: "Du Pont v. Du Pont"
Results 41 - 60
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2021, 3:51 am
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 584 A2d 490, 509 [Del Ch 1990], the Court rejected a valuation analysis that compared adjusted book value to market price as “akin to comparing apples to oranges. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:38 am
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 784 F.3d 1189, 1197 (Fed. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Sock It To Me, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:27 am
Bernatello’s Pizza, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 3:41 pm
Millison v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:42 am
See Octocom Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:01 pm
References [6] In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).[7] In re Mighty Leaf Tea, 601 F.3d 1342, 94 USPQ2d 1257, 1259 (Fed. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:05 am
" Campari Mexico, S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 1:13 pm
Le 9 septembre dernier, le gouvernement du Québec a adopté le nouveau décret 943-2020 (le Décret), lequel, comme l’a confirmé le ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité sociale dans une annonce gouvernementale communiquée à cet égard le même jour, vise notamment à protéger le lien d’emploi des employés devant s’absenter du travail en raison de la… [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
The court interpreted Millison v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
Schepers, who was the directory of the pathology laboratory at du Pont in the 1950s, and went on to work for the United States government in the 1960s and 1970s. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
Chavakula v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 101 N.J. 161, 501 A. 2d 505 (1985). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
" The Section 2(d) test is the same: the du Pont analysis, applied from the standpoint of the users of the certification mark. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:08 am
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 3:11 am
Barnaby Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Thus the second, third, and fourth du Pont factors favored opposer.As to the strength of opposer's mark SOCK IT TO ME under the fifth and sixth du Pont factors, the Board found that the mark had enjoyed a "moderate degree of commercial success:" more than 12 million pairs of socks sold between 2007 and 2017, extensive advertising, and some media coverage. [read post]
