Search for: "EEOC v. Ford Motor Company"
Results 41 - 55
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
It’s been three years since the 6th Circuit decided EEOC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
It’s been three years since the 6th Circuit decided EEOC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:04 am
I don’t always agree with the EEOC (see entry on Ford Motor Company, below), but I love it when government agencies try to help employers to comply with the law. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:56 am
As a resale buyer for Ford Motor Company, the employee purchased and resold steel to suppliers. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:54 am
*A lot of good law bloggers have weighed in on the EEOC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:18 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 12-2848, (6th Cir. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:50 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 11:34 am
Ford Motor Co. and Hamner v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
Ford Motor Co., US 6th Cir. (4/22/14)Labor & Employment LawIn 2003 Harris was hired as a resale buyer at Ford. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:11 am
This evidence, it asserted, along with the Sixth Circuit’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Ford Motor Company Western District of Kentucky at LouisvilleMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants Ford Motor Co. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
Likewise, five African-American employees were allowed to proceed on their retaliation and hostile environment claims based, in part, on an allegation that, after a coworker filed an EEOC charge on behalf of herself and a “class of Black employees,” they were given excessive workloads as compared to non-African-American workers (Rogers v Ford Motor Co). [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Ford Motor Co., 113 P.3d 82, 94-95 (Cal. 2005) (Campbell precludes something called "aggregate disgorgement," which the court analogized to punitive damages); Engle v. [read post]
