Search for: "Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm by Mark Walsh
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although the OFCCP’s focus on current pay, rather than on pay decisions does not comport with the relevant legal standard following the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co (89 EPD ¶42,827), contractors should still analyze current pay in addition to decisions impacting pay, according to experts speaking at the National Employment Law Institute’s (NELI) Thirty-First Annual Affirmative Action… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm by John Fisher
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Co., Case No. 12-4108)  Through a series of transactions, ownership of the Airdock had transferred from Goodyear to Lockheed. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the 2007 ruling clamping down on the time limit for filing pay discrimination claims. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:45 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
It did not however, change the requirement, mandated in the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, that Title VII claimants must identify and challenge discrete pay decisions. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Mary Whisner
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., on UW Law's Multimedia Gallery. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Mary Whisner
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., on UW Law's Multimedia Gallery. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm by George Lenard
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co, 550 U.S. 618 (2007), the Supreme Court had ruled in favor of Goodyear because Ledbetter’s discrimination charge against it had been filed more than 180 days after the alleged discriminatory decision had been made made, though within 180 days of the most recent paycheck affected by this decision. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 167 F.3d 776, 779 (2d Cir. 1999) (applying the same standard). [read post]