Search for: "HTC Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 11:30 am
Facts: This case (Valador, Inc v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:08 am
HTC America, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:15-CV-1524-JRG (E.D. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:15 am
COM, INC. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 8:15 am
The IPR challenges the validity of a patent owned by InfoGation Corporation, Inc., of San Diego, CA, a designer and developer of navigation software for the automotive industry, which was founded in 1996... [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:12 pm
The FTC highlights enforcement actions alleging companies’ failure to implement information security policies and procedures (CVS Caremark Corporation; Petco Animal Supplies), as well as to have a process for receiving, addressing, or monitoring reports about security vulnerabilities (HTC America, Inc.; TRENDnet, Inc.). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:14 am
Apple Inc., Appeal No. 15-2073 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:05 am
HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc., holding that a continuing application filed on the same day as the parent application issues as a […] [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
Such a declaration takes support from Arrow Generics Ltd v Merck & Co Inc .FKB's declaration intends to establish that its products were anticipated or obvious at the priority dates of the two patents. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:06 pm
” Id.(...)In HTC Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
In that case, we defended a former IT professional sued by his former employer, HTC Global Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of Neonode” (paragraph 363). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), filed a Joint Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Declaring All Asserted Patent Claims Invalid Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:10 am
Defendants HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership, Sprint Spectrum L.P., Kyocera Corporation, Boost Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and ZTE (USA), Inc. filed a motion to stay pending resolution of an inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"). [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:03 pm
Additionally, the Samsung case involvesthree co-defendants: Exedea, Inc.; the Samsung entities;and the HTC entities. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 48 [week ending on Sunday 31 May] - The meaning of EPO appeal system | 3D Printing and the law | Epo and external investigation firms | Umbrella designs | US Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems | European Inventor Award | FIFA and brand integrity | Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Wine in Black GmbH v OHIM | IP and busking | Swiss-style claims.Never too late… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
This question is likely still haunting Cisco following last week's US Supreme Court defeat in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems, Inc (2015), Annsley says.* The European Inventor Award - what is the EPO doing? [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 46 [week ending on Sunday 17 May] – Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc | "Three aspects of information: Current issues in trade secrets, client confidentiality and privilege" -- a new event | CJEU upon distribution right in Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA| UK Supreme Court on Mere reputation and passing-off |… [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
Of Judge and Jura-prudenceJeremy reports on Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc [2015] EWHC 1271 (Ch), a decision where Mr Justice Arnold of the Chancery Division, England and Wales, addressed the possible likelihood of confusion between JURA ORIGIN for "Scotch whisky and Scotch whisky-based liqueurs produced in Scotland" and ORIGIN and ORIGINS earlier marks.* Three aspects of information: a new eventJeremy presents "Three… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:38 am
("Rec") filed a patent infringement action against HTC America, Inc. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm
Cir. 2008); PowerOasis, Inc. v. [read post]
