Search for: "Hale v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Albeit somewhat reluctantly, Lady Hale agreed that the appeal had to be dismissed. [read post]
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
S. 61 (1975) (per curiam)United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
S. 186, 189, 204–208 (1946) (payroll records); Hale v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 8:16 pm
Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Sir John Dyson SCJ will hear MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department on Monday 11 October 2010. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
A cert petition has been filed seeking review of CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hale v City of Minot, 2015 ND 216, 868 N.W.2d 870 (8/25/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20140337.htm Filed under: Building Codes, Current Caselaw, Senior Housing [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
The Supreme Court has recently granted him permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision in the related case of R (Bancoult (No 3)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] EWCA Civ 708. [read post]
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm by David Wilson
With the recent decision in Winrose Homeowners’ Association, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm by David Wilson
With the recent decision in Winrose Homeowners’ Association, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]