Search for: "Harris v. Justice's Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
’s case was not, as the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal claimed, “more apparent than real”. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Harris v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
If you want to find the posts that have a particular tag, copy and paste the word(s) into the search box at the top left of this page, and when you find a post that has that tag, click on that tag. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Commentators suggest that reliance on the good judgment of prosecutors is no substitute for getting our laws right in the first place and arguably ensuring that prosecutors fully understand their role.[25] If one of the primary policy aims of prosecutorial discretionary powers are truly the reduction of over-criminalisation then an independent body should be able to monitor the aforementioned shortcoming of legislation and the Justice system’s reliance on discretion. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Commentators suggest that reliance on the good judgment of prosecutors is no substitute for getting our laws right in the first place and arguably ensuring that prosecutors fully understand their role.[25] If one of the primary policy aims of prosecutorial discretionary powers are truly the reduction of over-criminalisation then an independent body should be able to monitor the aforementioned shortcoming of legislation and the Justice system’s reliance on discretion. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:32 am
The Court cited as support Luckey v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
/ and at Times Higher Education First version of a basic introduction to the Court of Protection, by Victoria Butler-Cole, 39 Essex Street (via TheSmallPlaces) Information Rights and Wrongs: We Still Have Judgment Here Lawrence Lessig – Aaron’s Laws: Law and Justice in a Digital Age In the Courts Tony Bennett, a retired solicitor, was given a suspended prison sentence after he alleged that child Madeline McCann’s parents caused… [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
As the United States Supreme Court observed in Harris v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
Department of Justice investigated allegations of such agreements among a number of high-tech companies that restricted their ability to hire each other’s employees. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:28 am
Harris & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
Brinker v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
96-1040. -- October 21, 1998 Considered by HARRIS, P.J., and LARSON, LAVORATO, NEUMAN, and ANDREASEN,JJ. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Harris, Book Note, Reviewing Roger I. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Rev. 117-212 (2011).Harris, Michael Ray. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am
Compare this with the $57 million dedicated to civil legal assistance, or the $22 million dedicated to training family court judges and court personnel, or the $39 million dedicated to housing for battered women and their children. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm
Compare this with the $57 million dedicated to civil legal assistance, or the $22 million dedicated to training family court judges and court personnel, or the $39 million dedicated to housing for battered women and their children. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am
: "Parliamentary Pomp In The Land Down Under" pjblack.me/yZUFl6 #auspol club troppo's wrap of the australian blogosphere: "Missing Link Friday – Conservatism, prejudice and intelligence" pjblack.me/ztCUvU "Justice Rares makes orders in Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2)" pjblack.me/wQWEez #optusnrl "New Pornography Regulations in L.A.: Are They Addressing the Right… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Courts shed light on the application of CERCLA’s bona fide prospective purchaser defense. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:22 pm
Murray Newman, in Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center: The Legality of D.I.V.E.R.T. writes: The 14th Court of Appeals ruled that the Defendant was not entitled to a different judge than Judge Harmon, because Judge Harmon was correctly following the law when he refused to participate in DIVERT's pre-trial diversion program. [read post]
