Search for: "IN RE APPOINTMENTS OF MEMBERS TO THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT"
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
We’re talking about the United States Supreme Court. . . . [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
We’re talking about the United States Supreme Court. . . . [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Nevin asked about Parrella’s experience with terrorism abroad and what Parrella had read of the prior proceedings, motion arguments, pleadings, relevant Supreme Court and court of appeals cases about the military commissions, and more. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:53 am
Convey the message to your employees that you’re available and approachable. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:53 am
Convey the message to your employees that you’re available and approachable. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
The Trump Administration Re-Shapes the Federal Judiciary President Trump’s appointment of Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:05 pm
Amendments to section 11 of the ACA – In order to ensure speedy appointment of arbitrators, section 11 may be amended to provide that the appointment of arbitrator(s) under the section shall only be done by arbitral institution(s) designated by the Supreme Court (in case of international commercial arbitrations) or the High Court (in case of all other arbitrations) for such purpose, without the Supreme… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:46 pm
Studying Advertising Review As attorneys, most of our public marketing efforts must be submitted to the State Bar Advertising Review Committee under Part VII of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm
In addition, the Committee conducted in-person interviews of dozens of elected Supreme Court justice candidates from across the State, with only those applicants deemed “highly qualified” by the Committees submitted to the Governor for consideration for appointment to Appellate Division.Under the New York State Constitution and Judiciary Law, the Governor has the authority to appoint Presiding Justices to each Appellate… [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:35 am
From the States and Municipalities: Colorado – Colorado Supreme Court Hears Dispute on Whether Legal Fees Count as Political DonationsDenver Post – Tom McGhee | Published: 5/2/2017 The Colorado Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could decide whether free, or reduced-cost, legal services provided to political groups should be considered contributions under the state’s campaign finance law. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 7:08 pm
It seems likely that Judge Hu Yunteng, as a member of the SPC’s judicial committee (as well as others) were involved in the drafting of this policy document. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
Under Supreme Court precedent, “national defense information” is broadly defined and includes sensitive information relating not only to the military, but also to national security more generally. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:39 pm
In Re Trulia Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
The FLSC Standing Committee on the Model Code of Professional Conduct has prepared a discussion paper on the issues of former judges practicing law (unfortunately not available online). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
And this is why the House and Senate Judiciary Committees need to investigate what really happened here. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Kozlowski, 80 N.J. 378(1979); In re: Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381 (2002); Devaney v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Although this certainly means more work, I think it leads, and I hope it is perceived by professionals and the public as leading, to clearer cut reasoning and decisions. 6) What is the most memorable case of your House of Lords/Supreme Court career to date and why? [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court reminded us that the inquiry into whether a decision maker’s conduct creates a reasonable apprehension of bias is inherently contextual and fact-specific. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Such benchers will have law society ABS committees formed and they will become the chairs of those committees. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
In birth defects litigation, the problem of “cherry picking” is so severe that one of the leading professional societies concerned with birth defects has issued a position paper to remind its members, other scientists, and the public that “[c]ausation determinations are made using all the scientific evidence”: “Causation determinations are made using all the scientific evidence. [read post]
