Search for: "IN RE BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. " Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” (internal citations omitted)). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Baxter Healthcare, 947 F.Supp. 1387, 1392, 1397, 1403-04 (D. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:59 pm
In re Baxter International (CAFC 2011-1073) precedential; en banc, per curiam In this matter, a patent held valid in litigation is still subject to reexamination. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:56 am by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: CAFC: Judge Newman again questions the constitutionality of “do over” patent reexamination: In re Baxter International, Inc (Patents Post-Grant) (WHDA) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs)   Please join the discussion [...] [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Baxter appealed an obviousness finding from a re-examination proceeding. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
” Thus, even a party that was bound by IPX estoppel could file a request for EXP in an attempt to “undo” the effect of an the earlier court judgement, as was the case a few months back in the case of In re Construction Equipment, and again last week in the case of In re Baxter International Inc. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- In a dissent from the Federal Circuit's affirmance of a Board determination of obviousness, Judge Newman raises a jurisdictional and separation-of-powers argument in In re Baxter International, Inc. that is destined to be decided by the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
In re Bird Brain (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are PARK LANE and PARK AVENUE confusingly similar for footwear? [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
Syntura International, Inc., No. 10-1487, slip op. (4th Cir. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sent subpoenas in June to units of AXA SA, Genworth Financial Inc., Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America, Manulife Financial Corp., Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co., MetLife Inc., etc.Title Insurance: CALIFORNIA FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS ARBITRATION IN TITLE INSURANCE DISPUTE, In re Cal. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The defen- dants cite cases where this court rejected assertions of “teaching away” on the ground that the prior art did not directly warn against the claimed invention or teach that the claimed invention would not work, e.g., Baxter Interna- tional, Inc. v. [read post]