Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 41 - 60
of 9,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2009, 9:53 am
What the RTP procedure does not do is make the RTP a party to the case or impose any liability on them, including any res judicata effect from the prior trial. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
In Re: Tableware Antitrust Litigation (No. 04-3514 VRW, N.D. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:04 am
John Ward, of ED Texas and sitting by designation, wrote the nonprecedential opinion in In re Stauffer.Although involving obviousness, and motivation to combine, the opinion relies on Dystar, 464 F.3d 1356, and not KSR. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:58 am
I once heard a TTAB judge say that the outcome of most Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion cases can be predicted just by looking at the marks and the identified goods or services, without more. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 11:00 pm
July 20, 2015), after the plaintiff designated 95% of its forensically-produced documents (141,525 of 148,636) as “highly confidential”, Florida District Judge Jonathan Goodman ordered the plaintiff to re-review and re-designate those documents within ten days, and also assessed a $25,000 fees award against the plaintiff’s outside counsel to compensate the defendant for its efforts in reviewing the...Read the whole entry... [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:14 am
In re Diesel Power Gear, LLC, Serial No. 87261073 (February 27, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:34 am
And, it was common practice back then, and I think you’re justifying the practice, that the examiners very frequently would say ‘Well the claim is rejected A in view of B and C — with respect to the last element, that’s a matter of mere design choice of no patentable consequence. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:22 am
To the extent consumers would recognize the design as "a molecular design of the chemical endorphin," that merely visually represents the word ENDORPHIN and does not distinguish the marks. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:26 am
” See In re Nett Designs Inc., 57 USPQ2d at 1566.Instead, the Board turned to dictionary definitions to determine whether THE ORIGINAL has a laudatorily descriptive meaning. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Traditions, in short, are always breaking away from parts of themselves, glomming onto what is new, and then re-describing the changes as always having been part of the tradition, correctly understood.In 2024 America, some people will view the designated hitter rule, affirmative action, and abortion rights as important and longstanding traditions, while others will see one or more of them as serious departures from tradition. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:56 am
Imagine that you're a groundskeeper, or (as here) a designer, and receive a company check for your services. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
As Judge McKeague stated in his dissent:"It is apparent that either Congress or the Supreme Court (or both) must clarify copyright law with respect to garment design. [read post]
15 May 2011, 3:44 pm
This law is designed to stop judges from transitory positions in family court. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 3:35 am
For example, arbitrators may not have the same powers as a judge, and the decision of an arbitrator may not be appealable. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:27 am
In re Cumberland Valley Financial Corp., Serial No. 86827085 (April 5, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Hightower). [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:17 am
" In re Carolyn’s Candies. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 3:43 am
In re Graybeard Distillery, Inc., Serial No. 88182246 (October 19, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:39 am
In re Maloof Skateboarding, LLC, Serial No. 77931954 (May 23, 2012) [not precedential].We all know that marks are not to be analyzed in a side-by-side comparison. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:14 am
In re United States of America Supplements, LLC, Serial No. 87737243 (September 18, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:08 am
In re Alvogen IP Co. [read post]
