Search for: "In Re Grand Jury, 1974" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am by Matt Tait
But they’re wrong for very different reasons. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:29 am by ebcarpenter
  CCRP 1 Short title; citation of code CCRP 2 Purpose and construction CCRP 3 Procedures not otherwise specified CCRP 4 Number; gender CCRP 5 Mandatory and permissive language CCRP 6 Conjunctive, disjunctive, or both CCRP 7 Municipal and parochial officers included CCRP 8 Assistants and deputies included CCRP 9 References to code articles or statutory sections CCRP 10 Article headings, source notes, and comments not part of law CCRP 11 Clerical and typographical errors… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
” This modified the old rules and constitutional application in which the jury or commissioners were judges of the law and the facts. 10 In re Public Highway in Elba Twp, 236 Mich 282, 284; 210 NW 297 (1926). 11 A precise discussion of the changes in the constitution appears in State Hwy Comm v Vanderkloot, 392 Mich 159, 169-176, 191; 220 NW2d 416 (1974). [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Mason    Western District of Tennessee at Memphis 08b0015n.06  In re: Louis G. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 pm by Melanie Fontes
  Neither Congress nor President Jefferson cared for how partisan the Supreme Court and grand jury statements had become. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Kimberly Gordy
At the provider level, the questions we’re being asked are founded on the principle of autonomy. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:50 pm by Jeff Gamso
Connick announced that his office would hold a grand jury investigation. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
’Wallace was never told that the day before he died a grand jury in West Feliciana Parish, north of Baton Rouge, had re-indicted him in the prison guard’s death. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
  In a jury-research project we once conducted, a very nice older lady at one point threw up her hands and said: “I just want to know if he did it. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Todd Presnell
Nixon, faced the question whether the privilege protected President Nixon’s audiotapes from production in a criminal trial involving several individuals indicted by the Watergate grand jury. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Todd Presnell
Nixon, faced the question whether the privilege protected President Nixon’s audiotapes from production in a criminal trial involving several individuals indicted by the Watergate grand jury. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
Grand Trunk Ry, 55 N.H. 84 (1874) (reversing traumatic cancer verdict on other grounds) New Mexico White v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
Over objection, President Clinton’s secret service guards were ordered to testify before the grand jury during the Lewinsky scandal (In re Sealed Case, 1998), but presidents have nonetheless continued to rely on the discretion of the Secret Service. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am by Roy Ginsburg
However, it would appear that a situation such as being called to the grand jury, especially as a subject or target of the investigation, may be enough to trigger at least permissive indemnification. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
” The lawyer representing the Department of Justice eventually responded, “Not to my knowledge”—and then noted that he thought “the President would say, never before has Congress engaged in the sort of illegitimate things they’re doing. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by Barry Barnett
  The MDL process creates more uncertainty due to the weight the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation[3] gives to parties’ preferences; individual judges’ case loads, experience, and willingness to take on extra work; the locations of grand juries; and other factors that don’t often figure into regular motions to transfer venue. [read post]