Search for: "In Re Initial Public Offering Antitrust Litigation"
Results 41 - 60
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
The decision identifies two avenues by which a company’s statements of opinion or belief in registration statements for initial public offerings can lead to liability under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 11:05 am
In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, 702 F. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
There are just not enough “exits” (through a merger / acquisition or an initial public offering) to justify the size of the venture capitalism industry as a whole. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:30 am
’s plans for a public offering in November that was projected to value the app, which moves money for 1.3 billion people, at about $280 billion. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
I can't imagine it today, simply because I can't see how non-SEP holders--who have neither an antitrust duty to deal nor a FRAND licensing pledge to honor--would be treated worse by the courts (if they make a licensing offer) than SEP holders. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm
The primary issues arewhether sufficient corroborating evidence exists to supportthe finding of prior public use by TransWeb, andwhether the attorney fees are an appropriate basis fordamages under the antitrust laws in this context. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:22 am
Seeing that once again members of the SEC were refusing to answer legislators' questions and statements about what had happened, Ackerman said, "We're talking to ourselves and you're pretending to be here. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
Their interaction with the public has been limited to paper money. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:49 am
We offer here an overview of the key provisions included in the final version of the DMA and a reminder of the shaky foundations it rests on. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am
It has never offered its services through Groupon. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
But since no one knows what initial interest confusion is, and defendants can always introduce their single-digit CTR, I think we're done with the argument that keyword ads create initial interest confusion, at least in the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
15 May 2025, 10:34 am
This is where LexisNexis’ Practical Guidance excels, offering a streamlined solution that bridges the gap between initial research and final drafting. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:50 am
These claims could result in litigation and could require us to purchase a costly license or cease offering the implicated solutions unless and until we can re-engineer them to avoid infringement. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:50 am
These claims could result in litigation and could require us to purchase a costly license or cease offering the implicated solutions unless and until we can re-engineer them to avoid infringement. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
Need justification for each use, not just initial creation. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm
Commentary by Chris Sprigman, NYU School of Law: Microsoft antitrust litigation was how he started to learn ©: Microsoft’s argument was that it owned the © so nothing it could do with the © could violate antitrust law. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
The settlement marks the conclusion of litigation that has lingered since 2005. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
Who knows where the fifth and subsequent re-publications will appear. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
In light several key court of appeals decisions prior to Dukes (including the Second Circuit in In re IPO Securities Litigation, the Third Circuit in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, and even the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Dukes itself), this analytical model is not groundbreaking, but Dukes puts an end to any possible reluctance by the federal courts to resolve an issue of fact simply because it might overlap with the merits. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:56 pm
Qualcomm immediately announced that posting the bond or making deposit required by the court for the right to enforce the injunction during an appeal (something that Reuters initially got wrong) "will be completed within a few days. [read post]
