Search for: "In re Allen N. (2000)"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Manual at 611 n.188. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Kan. 1984) Allen v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm
Allen, 852 P.2d 697, 699 (Okla. 1993). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Rptr.2d 159, 168 n.15 (Cal. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Michal Freedman, and Leon Gordis, Reference Guide on Epidemiology 549, 617 & n.211, in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (3ed ed. 2011)[RMSE]. 2. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:13 pm
State,775 So. 2d 288, 289 (Fla. 2000) („[A]n extraordinary writpetition cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues thatwere or could have been raised on direct appeal or in priorpostconviction proceedings). [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Ass'n, 858 S.W.2d 33, 36 (Tex. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Professors Michael Green and Joseph Sanders are two of the longest serving interlocutors in the never-ending discussion and debate about the nature and limits of expert witness testimony on scientific questions about causation. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:59 pm
Ficosa N. [read post]
2 May 2022, 12:59 pm
” In re Kollar, 286 F.3d 1326, 1331 n. 3 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm
” See N. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Allen v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Judge Woodlock wryly commented upon the First Circuit’s ignoring the statutory mandate of Rule 702, by its embracing caselaw that predated the 2000 statutory amendment of the Rule: “While a 2000 amendment to Fed.R.Evid. 702 codified a rigorous reliability test, the Daubert line of cases has been read by the First Circuit as “demand[ing] only that the proponent of the evidence show that the expert’s conclusion has been arrived at in a scientifically sound and… [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 9:51 am
And by 2000, that number had increased to 48%. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
State, 754 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2000) ............................................................................ 11 State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Hyg. 3 (2000). 6 Patrick A. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am
Zugleich dient die Vorlage einer Vereinheitlichung der Rechtsprechung, die in Teilaspekten, nämlich bei der Frage, wie weit die Prüfungskompetenz der Kammern im Rahmen von Verlegungsanträgen geht, divergiert (vgl. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Raimondo, Fabián. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We continued our fixation with pre-service removal here, reporting on Allen v. [read post]
