Search for: "In re Appeal of Phillips" Results 41 - 60 of 711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 5:19 am by INFORRM
“There is no doubt that those derogations can only be made where they’re strictly necessary. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
In re Phillips Farms, LLC, Serial No. 78669171 (March 26, 2008) [not precedential].Syrah grapesThe PTO first squashed Applicant's argument that the case was not ripe for appeal: the subject application was filed under Section (1)(b) and, since a specimen of use had not yet been filed, the PTO incorrectly "conducted a preliminary review and found that the mark PETIT-PETITE is descriptive for wine, all wines, in all market conditions, absent the realities of the… [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:14 pm by April Kosten
Phillips sought to be re-employed by Westcan in October 2015, he was required to sign an “Expectation Agreement” as part of his application. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:57 am
Claims 1-19, 22-24, and 27 were rejected in re-exam. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:33 am
(For prior Law Blog coverage of Phillips, click here and here.) [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 5:24 pm
You play the hand you’re dealt.” What will the defense likely argue on appeal? [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:34 am by Charles Sartain
In this appeal Phillips reiterated without success that the evidence was factually insufficient and asked for remand to the trial court for a do-over. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:02 pm
From the beginning, this Court’s compelled-speech precedents have re­jected arguments that “would resolve every issue of power in favor of those in authority. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am by charonqc
Supreme court changes fair comment defence in libel cases Guardian: Lord Phillips says that key test for defending libel cases should be changed to ‘honest comment’ in light of new technology Spiller and another (Appellants) v Joseph and others (Respondents) [2010] UKSC 53 On appeal from the Court of Appeal [2009] EWCA Civ 1075 JUSTICES: Lord Phillips (President), Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown and Sir John Dyson SCJ JUDGMENT The Supreme Court… [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:48 am by Andrew Bainham, St Philips
The Supreme Court in Re S (A Child) [2015] UKSC 20 has allowed the local authority’s appeal against a costs order made by the Court of Appeal in favour of the Respondent Father (Re S (Appeal from Care and Placement Orders) [2014] EWCA Civ 135; [2015] 1 FLR 130). [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 11:32 am
Mind you, it's a bit ironic that we're granting you extra time merely to write a brief, whereas you, pursuant to 28 USC 2266, can typically make the Court of Appeals decide the case within 120 days with an appropriate request. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 5:25 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  This is illustrated in a 2020, Tyler Court of Appeals opinion styled, In Re: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm by John Rubin
The district court denied the motion, and the defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals. [read post]