Search for: "In re Erica R"
Results 41 - 60
of 152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
(In re Shaun R. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm
Erica P. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:40 am
Diamant, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Sunday, February 12, 2017 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Duty of good faith, Fiduciary duties, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Partnerships, Safe harbor Vindicating the Duty of Loyalty: Using Data Points of Successful Stockholder Litigation as a Tool for Reform Posted by Joel Friedlander, Friedlander & Gorris, P.A, on Monday, February 13, 2017 … [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:33 am
This term, the Supreme Court can — and should — strike down Missouri’s Blaine Amendment, argues IJ litigator Erica Smith. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:21 pm
If you’re under 21, don’t ask for a drink. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:43 am
Although this court decision is a welcome confirmation for employers, we’re still venturing into unchartered territory here, as I don’t know of another court addressing these issues as specifically as this one has done. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
” I say, “I read Erica Jong! [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 6:25 am
And when you’re a star, they let you do it. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:55 pm
Erica P. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
We’re rewriting the exemption. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
See FindWhat Inv’r Grp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
A-2154-14T4 PER CURIAM Plaintiffs Stacy Marie Wolin (Stacy), her daughters Erica Wolin and Jennifer Wolin, and Stacy as guardian ad litem for her son Brett Wolin, appeal a December 16, 2014 Chancery Division order dismissing their Amended Verified Complaint (complaint) with prejudice in accordance with Rule 4:6-2(e). [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:30 am
It’s maddening to watch public meetings where bike lanes are raged over like they’re landing pads for Martian armies. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
Erica P. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
In In re Mark C., supra, 244 Cal.App.4th 520, Division Two followed its earlier decision in In re Erica R., supra, 240 Cal.App.4th 907&n [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
” See In re Fairway Grp. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:20 am
(I recommend asking a law librarian for a tutorial if you’re not an experience legal researcher.) [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:20 am
(I recommend asking a law librarian for a tutorial if you’re not an experience legal researcher.) [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:03 am
These issues have been recently addressed in three published cases from different divisions of the Court of Appeal for the First District, each of which considered the legality of a virtually identical electronics search condition.In In re Erica R., supra, California Court of Appeals - Division Two of this court held the condition was invalid under Lent, because it had no relationship to the commitment offense of misdemeanor possession of Ecstasy. [read post]
