Search for: "Joff Wild"
Results 41 - 60
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 6:14 am
We have now been quoted extensively in a current blog article by Joff Wild on the IAM Magazine web site, in relation to what is now clearly an intentional campaign by IP Australia to challenge the patentability of anything they consider to be a ‘business method’ invention. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
By Eric Goldman A couple weeks ago, the High Tech Law Institute and the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology co-sponsored a major conference on the evolving patent ecosystem, called “Defense 2.0: New Strategies for Reducing Patent Risk. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:50 am
NPEs are in fact filling a licensing niche and playing an big role in commoditizing the IP market and monetizing it (a point that I believe was made by Joff Wild in his blog when explaining the changing role of these organizations). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:14 pm
On this I concur with Mr Wild. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:35 pm
In a conspirative mood, Joff Wild couldn't "help wondering whether member states and the Commission have been thinking in detail about the consequences of an adverse ruling this week and may very quickly come up with some stop-gap remedies". [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:57 pm
Joff Wild who edits the wonderful magazine IAM reported last week that Michelle Lee (Google's IP Chief) and Shanna Winters (Congressional Counsel) were also under consideration for the post. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:45 pm
In a related blog posting, IAM editor Joff Wild took a very similar position and commented that the ECJ decision is crucial because without a means of deciding disputes, in practical terms there can be no single patent. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
This would at least be an option to prevent that "those elements of the movement [...] will just end up making themselves irrelevant", as Joff Wild put it in his above-mentioned article. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm
Suárez Amy Towell Pat Walsh John White Joff Wild Tara J. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:02 am
Links Jeremy Phillips Neil Wilkoff Joff Wild Duncan Bucknell [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:15 pm
Suárez Amy Towell Pat Walsh Joff Wild Tara J. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:50 am
Joff Wild From IAM magazine has been sleuthing about and had the following report from his blog:My information, which comes from an excellent source, is that [Round Rock] was organised through a company called Gemas Capital Inc, which was established in June 2009 by Zahid Rahimtoola, who is the chief financial officer of IP Value. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:49 am
However, on the contrary, Mr Ilya Kazi, Chartered Patent Attorney and partner from intellectual property advisors Mathys & Squire is reported to have said in the same Telegraph article said that 'The announcement of a review of British IP laws is long overdue'.See also Mr Joff Wild here and there in the IAM Blog. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
from Joff Wild at IAM:So, Townsend and Townsend and Crew is soon to join that long list of once independent US IP firms that are now no longer with us. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:57 pm
Also refering to the EurActiv piece, Joff Wild of the IAM blog comments on the more (socio and business) cultural aspects of that intense discussion: Language goes to the very heart of how a country views itself. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:12 am
--part 3 Joff Wild had hammered one obvious defect in Marki's piece, the failure to recognize that patents are beneficial to society as a whole because they make knowledge available. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:26 am
Dennis Crouch at PatentlyO has pulled out some highlights from the interview, and Joff Wild (the aforementioned British guy) summarized it as well. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Joff Wild of IAM Magazine has posted a 40-minute video of a recent interview with USPTO Director David Kappos. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:25 pm
Mr Joff Wild in the IAM Blog went one step further and wrote that the EU patent is dead in the water. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
One could almost hear that famous line Now there you go again directed to Joff Wild at IAM as to the text about findings from a IAM/Thomson Reuters benchmarking survey that show issued US patents are thought to be of lower quality than those granted by the EPO and the JPO,"Back in the day" one recalls the series of articles by Quillen and Webster making similar assertions. [read post]
