Search for: "Kumho Tire Co." Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
Martin, 690 F.2d 1078, 1082 (4th Cir. 1982)(citations omitted) Of course, not long after the District of Columbia Circuit decided Ferebee, in 1993, the Supreme Court decided Daubert, followed by decisions in Joiner, Kumho Tire, and Weisgram. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am by Schachtman
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997); Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
In the words of Judge Jed Rakoff, who served on the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology,[5] addressed the limited ability of cross-examination in the context of forensic evidence: “Although effective cross-examination may mitigate some of these dangers, the explicit premise of Daubert and Kumho Tire is that, when it comes to expert testimony, cross-examination is inherently handicapped by the jury’s own lack of background knowledge, so that… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
Daubert itself was a pharmaceutical product liability case, as were Joiner and Kumho Tire. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
Contra Kumho Tire To get to his conclusion, Gelbach attempts to remove the constraints of traditional standards of significance probability. [read post]
12 May 2018, 4:56 pm by Schachtman
” Browne at 143 (quoting from Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Id. at 589; see also Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]