Search for: "MARTIN v. FEDERAL MOTOR CO." Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness:… [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 836-38 (Conn. 2001); Coyle v. [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 11:28 am
 All of this is nicely, and perhaps easier to grasp on an operational level, by recalling the history and generational revisions of one of the great instruments for trust building and protection within the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure--its Rule 11 on attorney sanctions which required what was then considered significant amendment in 1983, and then again in 1993 ostensibly to clean up the interpretive mess created in the aftermath of the 1983 amendments. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Gerregano (note that Sarah Martin and I co-filed an amicus brief on the other side in this case, on behalf of Simon Tam of Matal v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
See, e.g., Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032 (Pa. 2016). [read post]