Search for: "MATTER OF STANDARDS FOR COUNSEL REP"
Results 41 - 60
of 389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2013, 4:05 am
The amendment, introduced by Rep. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:34 pm
The former special counsel assented in response to a question from Rep. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
As a follow-up to my previous Lawfare article, I will explore, in detail, the reasons for the long-running discord between civil society and military approaches and focus on why that matters in the context of CHMR-AP implementation. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:17 am
When there is any doubt whatsoever, employers should consult with counsel to help navigate the rocky shoals of the FLSA and its implementation. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Rep. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
Rep. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:21 am
Rep. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:38 pm
In his new book, Eric Lichtblau accuses Rep. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Further, explained the Commissioner, "[t]o be considered willful, the board member’s actions must have been intentional and with a wrongful purpose" and in an appeal or removal application to the Commissioner, the petitioner has the burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested and the burden of establishing the facts upon which petitioner seeks relief.School board members, as public officers, take an oath of office to uphold the law and faithfully… [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm
Meanwhile, on May 17, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin made clear he would not comply with a congressional subpoena to hand over Trump’s tax returns to Rep. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Opposing counsel is one of its few members. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Rep. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
Concern have been expressed about the PCAOB’s new standard – and the CAMs concept in particular. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
When a petition is not properly verified, the appeal must be dismissed (Appeal of D.P., 46 Ed Dept Rep 516, Decision No. 15,580; Appeal of C.S., 46 id. 260, Decision 15,501). [read post]
4 May 2019, 11:50 am
Lindsey Graham and Rep. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
Court decided as a matter of law there was no red flag knowledge, turning statute into pure notice and takedown which was specifically rejected. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Third, we explain why existing disclosures in this area provide support for, rather than reason to oppose, standardized, mandatory climate-related disclosures. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:33 pm
In February, Rep. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:13 am
Fuerch for the advice and counsel you need. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:32 am
” But Rep. [read post]
